About Marius Mihail Russo-Got
25+ years modernising mission-critical digital platforms in regulated environments — banking, digital public infrastructure and government, security and defence.
Career oriented toward end-to-end ownership of complex enterprise digital platforms — strategy and governance, innovation, architecture, delivery, operations, and digital backbone consolidation and optimisation — across the full lifecycle of intake → prioritisation → deliver → run → retire. Engagements at NATO/NCIA, the United Nations, the European External Action Service, the European Central Bank, INTERPOL, Innovation Center, and Groupe Société Générale.
Where I operate
Top-tier banking · digital public infrastructure for governments · security and defence · international organisations. NATO Secret cleared, based in Bucharest, working across Europe and globally.
What's on this page
Biography, full career timeline (1996–present), education and certifications, philosophy of practice, best-fit engagements and FAQ. For the measured outcomes and capability pillars, see the homepage.
A short biography
I am Marius Mihail Russo-Got — also published and known as Marius Russo. Romanian, based in Bucharest, with an engineering degree in Computer Science and Information Technology from the Polytechnic University of Bucharest. Over more than 25 years I have moved through the full arc of mission-critical IT delivery: hands-on systems engineering and IT direction at Helinick (1996–2002), large-scale secure-network programme delivery at Alcatel (2002–2006), distributed-team programme management at Motorola (2006–2008), regulated-client architecture and programme advisory at IBM (2008–2011), security and IT governance at Groupe Société Générale BRD (2011–2013), advisory at the European Central Bank and the UNDP / EU Advisory Group in Armenia (2014–2015), enterprise platform transformation at the United Nations HQ — UNFCU and OICT (2016–2019), Section Head for Digital and AI at the Innovation Center (2019–2022), Senior Project Manager for Cloud Security and Architecture at the EEAS (2022–2023), Section Head for Content Collaboration at NATO / NCIA / NDW in The Hague (2023–2024), and currently Chief Innovation Officer / CTO at PIR2-IT, serving top-tier banking and defence clients across Europe and the United States.
The shape of the work has been consistent: institutions bring me in when transformation has to land cleanly under regulatory, security or institutional pressure, and they need a single named architect who personally signs off on the architecture, the governance posture and the delivery plan. The portfolio runs across top-tier banking and financial services, defence and intelligence, digital public infrastructure and government modernisation, and international organisations. Engagement details and confidential metrics are available on request under the appropriate terms; selected outcomes from the public record are summarised below.
Two strands of the work are worth surfacing explicitly. First, on national-scale digital public infrastructure, I have held architecture authority on Romania's flagship sovereign digital services — ePassport, eVignette, eHealth, eCadastre and eNotar — and have provided architecture advisory for complex DPI programmes across 39 countries in Europe and worldwide, covering identity, trust, interoperability, payments and citizen-facing service delivery at country scale. Second, on quantum strategy, I currently advise sovereign and regulated institutions in the Middle East on quantum-safe migration planning, cryptographic agility and post-quantum architecture posture for environments that already need a defensible plan.
Career timeline
Click any role to see the named projects delivered there.
2024–Present · PIR2-IT — Chief Innovation Officer / CTO (B2B). Top-tier banks and defence clients in regulated, mission-critical environments; large-scale application migration and transformation; AI-enabled delivery and integration where applicable. See projects →
2023–2024 · NATO / NCIA / NDW, The Hague — Section Head, Content Collaboration. 12 + 24 matrix reports; OPEX up to US$41M / CAPEX up to US$24M; 821 components → 115 consolidated, 369 retired; US$3.9M value; 99.999% availability. See projects →
2022–2023 · EEAS, Brussels — Senior PM, Cloud Security & Architecture. 6 + 32 matrix reports; OPEX up to US$29M+ / CAPEX up to US$14M+; +27% releases / -36% MTTR / -52% incidents; US$1.4M savings. See projects →
2019–2022 · Innovation Center, Worldwide / Bucharest — Section Head, Digital & AI. 39 experts directed; defence, banking and oil & gas clients; CyberPro AI-driven threat correlation; US$2.6M savings. See projects →
2016–2019 · UN HQ — UNFCU / OICT, New York — Senior IT Officer (Staff Member). 15 + 25 matrix reports; OPEX up to US$56M / CAPEX up to US$12M; active-active 99.98% with RTO <4h / RPO 15 min; -35% audit findings within 1 year. See projects →
2015–2016 · NATO HQ / NCIA / CSU BRX, Brussels — Principal NNHQ IT Services Coordinator. Coordination of personnel and equipment migration into new NATO HQ; 67M+ USD budget executed. See projects →
2011–2015 · Freelance — eight framework contracts: ECB, INTERPOL Singapore, UN Tbilisi, UNDP/EU Armenia, UNOPS Kabul, ENISA, Société Générale (BRD), eIDAS / SSEDIC. 848-component portfolio at SocGen; 39% year-1 savings sustained 3 years. See projects →
2008–2011 · IBM, Worldwide / Bucharest — EMEA Centre of Excellence for Defence & Security + EMEA CoE for eGovernment. ePassport, eID, eHealth, Cadastre, eJustice, National PKI across multiple countries; 1,000+ apps. See projects →
2006–2008 · Motorola, Austin TX / Bucharest — Programme Manager. 286 programmes & projects; military-sector PMO; 96 PoCs. See projects →
2002–2006 · Alcatel, Paris / Bucharest / Timişoara — Senior Architect / CoE Manager. Defence, security & intelligence CoE; Regional CoE for eGovernment (ePassport, eID, DigiNotar, civil registration, EURODAC); 21+ client digital backbone unification. See projects →
1996–2002 · Helinick, Bucharest — Systems Engineering / IT Director. 14-person team; biometric access control; US$200K+ Y1 OPEX savings. See projects →
Education and certifications
- Polytechnic University of Bucharest — Computer Science / Information Technology, engineering degree.
- Harvard — Risk Management Professional.
- SAFe Agilist (SA), SAFe POPM (Product Owner / Product Manager).
- ITIL (Master / Foundation).
- PRINCE2 · TOGAF · COBIT.
- Frameworks referenced and used across programmes: ISO 27001 · NIST 800-53 · PCI DSS · GDPR · SWIFT CSP.
Languages, mobility and clearance
- Romanian — native.
- English — fluent.
- French — professional.
- NATO Secret security clearance — issued August 2022.
- Experienced in multicultural, cross-time-zone delivery; open to international assignments.
- Based in Bucharest, Romania; engagements delivered across Europe and globally.
How I think about the work
Credibility is documented, not claimed. In mission-critical environments, every architecture decision must be traceable, every control must be evidenced, every outcome must be measurable, and the institution must be able to defend every choice under audit, oversight or political scrutiny. The career portfolio above is structured around that conviction — engagements that cannot be backed by KPIs, control evidence and post-implementation review do not belong in the record.
End-to-end ownership is the differentiator. The work runs the full lifecycle — strategy & target architecture → roadmap & business case → delivery → cutover & go-live → operate & optimise → rationalise & retire — with KPI governance across intake → prioritisation → deliver → run → retire. Programmes do not stop at design; the same hand that authors the architecture stays accountable through stabilisation and optimisation. That continuity is the largest single lever for reducing drift across multi-year transformations under high political and regulatory volatility.
The digital backbone is where reliability lives. Most public-facing failures of regulated institutions are backbone failures — network, identity, integration, data, observability, security. Consolidating and optimising the backbone is the single most effective intervention for stabilising run, accelerating delivery, and reducing operational risk. The measured outcomes across UN, EEAS, Innovation Center and NATO portfolios — 99.999% availability, +27% to +74% faster releases, -23% to -52% incidents, multi-million-USD rationalisation savings — are all backbone work.
Best-fit engagements
- Top-tier banking modernisation under SWIFT CSP / PCI DSS / ISO 27001 oversight.
- Digital public infrastructure design and delivery for governments.
- NATO and defence digital programmes with classified-environment delivery.
- UN-system and EU-institution platform transformation.
- Digital backbone consolidation and optimisation across complex multi-vendor estates.
- AI governance and quantum-readiness strategy for regulated institutions.
- Audit-readiness and ICFR-aligned controls roll-outs (ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS).
- Architecture authority and governance design as second-line review on programmes already in trouble.
How engagements work
- Engagements are scoped against a written architecture or governance mandate, not a generic SOW.
- I personally hold and sign the architectural decisions; engagements are not delegated to a rotating staff pool.
- Deliverables are evidence-led: target architecture, decision logs, control matrices, delivery KPIs, transition states, rationalisation outcomes.
- Engagements run from intensive multi-week interventions through multi-year retained advisory.
- Remote-first across Europe, with on-site presence at NATO, UN, EU and banking client locations as required.
- Engagement-confidential metrics are available under NDA on request.
Frequently asked questions
Why an independent named architect rather than a Big 4 consultancy? When a programme runs for three to seven years across multiple political cycles, what fails first is decision continuity. A single accountable architect maintains the architectural memory of the institution — what was decided, why, on what evidence, and what changed. That continuity is the largest single lever for reducing drift.
What does "end-to-end ownership" mean in practice? Engagements are not delegated to a rotating staff pool. The same hand that authors the architecture stays accountable through cutover, stabilisation and run. Deliverables are evidence-led — target architecture, decision logs, control matrices, delivery KPIs, transition states — not slide decks.
Why is "digital backbone consolidation" the most consistent theme of the career? Most public-facing failures of regulated institutions are backbone failures — network, identity, integration, data, observability, security. Consolidating and optimising the backbone is the single most effective intervention for stabilising run, accelerating delivery and reducing operational risk. The measured outcomes across UN, EEAS, Innovation Center and NATO portfolios are all backbone work.
What's the smallest engagement you'll take? Intensive multi-week interventions where architecture authority, governance design, or audit-readiness must be set up cleanly under pressure. Below that, the answer is usually a referral.
Will you sign an NDA before discussing engagement specifics? Yes — engagement-confidential metrics, named clients beyond what's published, and case-study detail are available only under NDA. Comparable, anonymised evidence can be shared in advance of any commercial commitment.
How do I get in touch? Email marius@russogot.com, call +40 752 624 444, LinkedIn /in/mariusrusso. The contact page has the full direct details.
Related across this site
- Areas of expertise — the structured capability hub.
- Enterprise architecture — target-state architecture and decision governance.
- Cybersecurity and governance — secure-by-design and audit-defensible controls.
- Institutional governance — decision frameworks and accountable execution.
- Programme & service delivery — delivery governance and stabilisation.
- Cloud & platform engineering — hybrid backbone modernisation.
- Cloud, platforms & resilience — DR, BC, active-active patterns.
- Data protection & DLP — GDPR-aligned information governance.
- Banking and financial services — regulated-platform engagements.
- Defence and intelligence — C4ISR and mission-critical systems.
- Digital public infrastructure — DPI architecture for governments.
- Zero Trust architecture — identity-centric defensible control.
- Innovation and architecture — AI, AIOps, emerging tech.
- Institutional integrity — credibility and due process.
- Beyond the painting — long-form integrity case study.
- Contact — direct details for advisory engagements.
References & recommendation letters
Formal recommendation letters exist from senior contacts across NATO, UN, EU and banking engagements. Named references and direct contact details are available after a mutual NDA is in place.
Names and contact details are not published on this site for GDPR reasons — individuals who provided recommendations have not consented to public disclosure of their personal data. This is standard practice for senior professionals operating across regulated and classified environments. The letters and references exist; they are simply not the internet's business until there is a legitimate, confidential engagement context.
Credibility is not claimed. It is documented — and verifiable under appropriate terms.